Sihai network

How does oncologist treat infertility to return a responsibility? Is the skill of medicine superb or

Obviously, it is necessary to find out whether the doctors involved are stepping on the two red lines of "medicine" and "medicine". This is not only an account to the patients involved, but also an account to the image of traditional Chinese medicine and Internet diagnosis and treatment. It's amazing that oncologists can treat infertility! Is it superb medical skills or just taking over?

Big V @ Chengdu sewer, who is certified as a licensed doctor by real name on Weibo, recently published an article criticizing Zhang shaocong, an oncologist in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of traditional Chinese medicine, saying that Zhang shaocong, as an oncologist, created the image of an infertility expert through certified Weibo and Toutiao, prescribed a prescription called "honey pill" to patients, and guided them to transfer money to "doctor Baixing" to buy medicine. In this regard, his hospital said that it had learned about the matter and was holding an interview with the hospital supervision department and other departments. The specific situation needs to be further understood.

The reason why this incident has aroused public attention is undoubtedly that oncologists treat infertility. In addition, in the context of the new medical situation, such as the transformation of diagnosis and treatment services from offline to online and multi-point practice, which has a profound impact on the medical system, Zhang shaocong's event of "looking at cancer offline and infertility online" is also of great practical significance.

Zhang shaocong explained that "traditional Chinese medicine never divides families" for his behavior of "looking at cancer offline and infertility online". However, people with a little medical knowledge will understand that this explanation is untenable.

According to Article 14 of the law of the people's Republic of China on traditional Chinese medicine, the scope of diagnosis and treatment, the name and practice scope of the doctor of traditional Chinese medicine should be publicized in the obvious position of the clinic, and medical activities should not be carried out beyond the scope of filing. Article 8 of the measures for the administration of medical practice registration stipulates that after obtaining the medical practice certificate, doctors should engage in corresponding medical and other activities according to the registered practice location, practice category and practice scope.

That is to say, as an oncologist, whether Zhang shaocong has the professional knowledge of infertility remains to be verified. However, if his "medical practice certificate" does not cover the scope of infertility, he is suspected of practicing beyond the scope.

In the interview, Zhang shaocong also mentioned that he has a cure rate of 30%, even endorsing his own behavior. He also said that compared with a master of traditional Chinese medicine, only a few people who have been in the clinic for 50 years have been effective. This so-called "word-of-mouth" is not a cure rate in a statistical sense. It is also a lack of professional ethics to step down other people to raise his own level.

Looking at the microblog of "big V" @ Chengdu sewer, you can see that he posted some messages and screenshots of patients and related people about the doctor's practice. Of course, we can also see some patients taking themselves as an example to prove that their medical skills and 'honey pill' prescriptions are really effective. As for the query, the doctors involved totally denied it, saying that the online accusation was' deliberate hype 'and could not be made public, but the effect was' well-known'.

Whether the drug is effective or not is closely related to the specific situation of the patients themselves. It is indeed a professional problem, and it is not easy to make a conclusion. However, there are many doubts between "pickpocketing" and "anti pickpocketing".

For example, Zhang shaocong said that the self-made "honey pill" is his secret recipe and cannot be disclosed to the public. It should be admitted that the idea of "secret recipe should not be spread" has existed among the people for many years and has been accepted by many people. However, modern society not only needs to protect intellectual property rights, but also needs to avoid promoting pseudo science and pseudo products in the name of protecting intellectual property rights.

What are the ingredients of "honey pill", whether it is "one person one party" or mass production, whether it changes the characteristics of the original drug, and whether "doctor Baixing" of the involved platform has the relevant qualifications & hellip; & hellip;, all these problems should obviously arouse the attention of the involved hospitals and local regulatory departments, and intervene in the investigation, so as to give patients, the public and public opinion an authoritative and fair explanation.

Under the background of Internet diagnosis and treatment in full swing, it is obviously necessary to find out whether the doctors involved in the event of "cancer doctors treating infertility" step on the red lines of "medicine" and "medicine". This is not only an account to the patients involved, but also an account to the image of traditional Chinese medicine and Internet diagnosis and treatment.