Sihai network

Who is Jiamusi changlingling? A review of the details of Chang Lingling's collision

&#At noon today, the program "the mystery of the old man's falling to the ground" broadcast by CCTV's "today's story" caused many people to complain about Chang Lingling. Netizens showed a one-sided tendency to choose whether Chang Lingling hit people or was hit by porcelain: "love Chang Lingling" and "feel aggrieved for Chang Lingling of Jiamusi".

Regardless of who is right or who is wrong in the changlingling incident, whether changlingling is really hit by people or by porcelain, let's meet changlingling, the hero of the incident. Changlingling said that she was helping the old man to do a good job, but was involved in a right and wrong, and another said that she was hit by a car, but was publicly abused, so she had to go to the court to comment. ​ it's not fair to say that Chang Lingling has a chance to bump into the old man, but I don't understand why these traffic police didn't collect evidence from the people around them, and later the second trial, which was proved by experts, was also defeated.

The most important thing is that changlingling's words should not be signed at the beginning. It's too careless to be someone else's handle. What I don't understand is not only the problem of porcelain bumping, but also the problem of Wang Xiaonan's policeman. I don't know if it's forcing her to sign, and if there's any inside story with the old man. But this is the first time I doubt the police so much, whether there is justice or not.

Today's statement is really infuriated. I went to Weibo for the first time to search. What kind of ghost is the verdict? The evidence is very clear and still so. Changlingling is really wronged. The appraisal is useless. The video screen is useless. The witness is useless. I hope that traffic policeman didn't tell lies, why there is no law enforcement recorder when signing an agreement for law enforcement.

At last, I saw that there were some chills. Before I helped them, I would first see if there was a camera, or if there was a 120 or something, and then I would go. If there was no evidence, I would not help myself. It was unclear. Lingling also wants to solve the problem earlier. It's because of the word that it's bad for her. I wonder why there are two different conclusions for the same video of two authoritative organizations. Which organization is bullshit! &;