What's the matter with microblog blocking pockmarks? As the most popular small video at present, buffeting has never appeared on microblog. What's the grudge between the two? In response to the "blocking buffeting", microblog said for the first time tonight, "all fair competition should be based on fairness.". '
At today's brand upgrade conference, short video platform qiaoyin (under the banner of today's headlines) responded to the killing by Sina Weibo: 'Weibo's killing of qiaoyin has affected the user experience. We welcome the market competition and hope that the peers can compete fairly by providing better products for users with an open mind. '
Since March 10, several users have reported that after the link of buffeting is forwarded to Sina Weibo, it will not appear in the personal homepage and information flow, only visible to them.
In response, Weibo said that in August last year, due to the illegal grabbing of Weibo content and stealing of user information due to Weibo headlines (headlines are products), Weibo suspended all interfaces and other cooperation with today's headlines at that time, and carried out rights protection through legal means. Before the final judgment of the case was made, Weibo had no new actions in the near future.
According to the 2016 "case of unfair competition in micro blog complaints" (2016) Jing 73 min Zhong No. 588 judgment, the third party who obtains micro blog user data and micro blog information content needs to obtain the authorization of micro blog platform, otherwise it will be regarded as unfair competition.
Some microblog related people also questioned: 'last year, we stopped cooperation. I don't know why we suddenly jumped out at this time and said this?'