On March 17, Han Han, a writer, director and race car driver, commented on the runaway Mercedes Benz incident, saying: 'I think it's very strange. It seems that from today on, the story begins to turn over. It is not because of the failure of Mercedes Benz cruise control system as it has been mentioned before. It may also be artificially deliberated speculation, plus the rendering of a mass media. What is the truth of the matter?
Screenshot of Han Han's microblog
Han Han analyzed this matter in detail from five aspects, such as brake system, high-speed road condition, driving speed, use of accessories and owner's practice. He concluded that 'cruising may not be cancelled at one time, but the speed of the vehicle is controllable, and the owner exaggerates and deducts a considerable part of the content', and said 'I will not conspiracy to discuss the owner's motivation, all based on the test results and the video investigation of traffic police Yes, I'd like to apologize if I'm wrong. '
On the evening of March 14, a Mercedes Benz went out of control at high speed and called the police for help. The owner said that it could not slow down and stop because it was out of control after starting the cruise at a fixed speed, so it could only run at a speed of 120 km / h. then the traffic police department opened the lane, contacted Mercedes Benz after-sales and other timely operations, so that the Mercedes Benz could reach its destination safely. Later, the owner of the car said in an interview: 'at that time, all the systems of Mercedes Benz were out of order, and the steering wheel was active. With the help of the traffic police, Mercedes Benz rushed through the toll station at a speed of 120 km / h. The remote-controlled parking of Mercedes Benz company described on the Internet was nothing. I opened the door to slow down. '
Han Han Original:
I'll say more about the runaway Mercedes. First of all, we should thank the traffic management department for its quick response and serious responsibility. Second, we should be glad that the car owner is OK. There are a lot of doubts about the whole thing, and there are many versions. One is about Benz remote locking, another is about the car owner opening the door and slowing down, another is about the car being towed away for testing, another is about the car owner continuing to use, which may be the reporter's own play when describing it, or the car owner casually saying in the face of different media, we will follow the latest version.
The latest version is that the car owner turns on cruising and constant speed. The car is locked at 120, unable to accelerate, decelerate or brake. The traffic police opens the life passage for the car owner. The car owner passes the toll station safely and runs for an hour. Finally, the car owner lowers the speed and brakes successfully by opening the door to release the safety belt and other means. The car owner continues to drive to Chengdu at a low speed, and the vehicle is still in use.
I have some questions. First of all, although most modern vehicles are electronic accelerator and electronic brake, in terms of brake, the electronic signal is only responsible for the booster pump, and the foot can still push the hydraulic clutch brake disc, but there is no power. Most men can step on the car without brake power, even some old-fashioned professional drivers just don't like brake power. This is a logic of vehicle design. The physical priority of braking is not unique to Mercedes Benz, as everyone does. If the brake fails completely, it only means that the brake system is broken physically. For example, the brake oil pipe is broken, which is usually irreversible. It is unlikely that the car will be OK again and can continue to be used.
Second, China's highway conditions, even if the four lane night, to drive at a constant speed of 120, an hour without a few parallel cars, really need a lot of luck. A lot of friends who say that you can also drive with less empty cars. You only drive a few minutes and more than ten kilometers, which is not a concept with an hour and more than one hundred kilometers. In short, this is very difficult.
Third, the traffic management department is responsible for emptying several lanes of toll stations for car owners. But the speed of the vehicle out of the high-speed toll gate is not 120 kilometers per hour. I feel about 80.
Fourth, the vehicle is stuck in cruising 120. The gearshift brake and accelerator are useless. Only the steering wheel with power can be used freely, which is also strange.
Fifthly, in the face of a car that can only drive 120 and can't stop, the owner of the car died all his life. After all difficulties, he finally escaped from the dead and finally stopped. Shouldn't we help the police seal up the evidence and negotiate with the manufacturer immediately? How can we continue to drive to Chengdu to attend the meeting and still use it. I don't dare to change me.
To sum up, I think this matter is very strange. We must test the vehicle well. I would like to apologize to the owner if the car is really stuck and 120 can't brake.
I suggest that the traffic management department along the road carefully look at the road monitoring and speed measurement, or check the interval speed measurement to see if the car owner has accelerated and decelerated within this hour, and whether it really keeps 120. I suspect that cruising may not be cancelled at one time, but the speed of the vehicle is controllable. The owners exaggerate and deduce quite a part of the content.
In addition, I also suggest that the traffic control department should never allow such a 120 hour car to go on the road without braking. Even if the owner of the car is brave enough to ignore the suspicion of Mercedes Benz and willing to continue driving, in order to protect the safety of the owner and the masses of the people, we can not let it drive on the road. No one can guarantee that this is the problem of cruising and constant speed. If it suddenly breaks down again in the urban area, it will become a shell. Such a vehicle should be regarded as a major lethal weapon and a major threat to public security. Whether the owner is willing or not, it must be towed away immediately and strictly tested. If it does not trust Mercedes Benz, it can be tested by a third party. During the test, Mercedes Benz shall provide the owner with a spare vehicle. It is recommended to lock the drive wheels in the trailer to prevent the vehicle from suddenly drawing air.
Finally, I don't wash the floor for Mercedes Benz. Mercedes Benz's PR can't afford it. The ABC pump of my Benz S65 is broken, and I'm still claiming for compensation. I will not conspiracy to discuss the motives of the car owners, everything depends on the test results and the video investigation of the traffic police. Again, if I'm wrong, I'd like to apologize publicly.