For the new scheme added by ofo, the original users of ofo will not buy it. CCTV reporters immediately interviewed several users of ofo: users of ofo minibus: it's too pit, I won't use it anymore, so I'll be cheated. Ofo small yellow car user: I submit the deposit and use for cycling. I do not submit the deposit for shopping.
Ofo small yellow car users: they owe us money. Now let's spend more money to buy their things, which is even more unacceptable. It's equivalent to taking in more money. His previous money hasn't been solved. I'm particularly surprised that I refunded the deposit to over 9 million people. If it's calculated as 10 million, if one person takes 100 yuan, how much will it be? More than 10 billion yuan.
Huang Hao, a researcher at the Institute of financial and economic strategy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that the long-term default of ofo in returning the deposit forced consumers to adopt the "shopping cash back" method, which was suspected of forced shopping, which was unfair to consumers. Li Yuan, senior partner of Beijing law firm, said that the platform didn't clearly stipulate the proportion of commodity rebate, and didn't exclude the platform from further reducing the proportion of rebate after the user signed the agreement, and so on In fact, the contract is useless. The irrevocable user of deposit conversion will lose the right of recourse.
At the same time, the lawyer stressed that once the user clicks to confirm the signing of the agreement, it means that the ofo platform will no longer assume the obligation to return the deposit, which means that the user can no longer recover the deposit from the ofo.