In the glory of the king, Garro's winning rate and strong output can be said to be no worse than Houyi Luban, but his playing rate is far less than these two. Why?
1. The early stage is too weak
In fact, Lu Ban was cumbersome in the early stage of the team, with insufficient output, no shift, too much need for protection, and it was easy to become the opposite ATM. Although Lu Ban had soft control, Hou Yi's big also had stable control. Once seen by the assassins of the other side, it's basically a nine dead life. Especially for novice players, there is no flash skill in the early stage, and they basically catch one dead.
2. Similar damage
Many people say that the latter part of Garro's life was very serious, causing damage that would explode in the sky and slow down after a deadly attack. But remember, Luban and Houyi will not be bombed. Luban and Hou Yi's late sprays are all spillover damage that can not be carried by pure meat, so I think these three heroes are similar, and galo's performance is not outstanding.
3. Serious blue consumption
Players who like to play Archer must know that the level of blue consumption of archer is next to that of mage. In the absence of blue, it is very difficult to hit tons of damage, which will also lead to the failure of group war, thus causing team quarrels.
4. Price of Garro
We all know that the price of Lu Ban and Hou Yi is 8888 and 6888 respectively, but the price of Garro is 13888, which also leads to the fact that many players cannot own it, which is why Garro is very strong, but its appearance is far less than that of Hou Yi and Lu Ban. To sum up, the later period of Galileo is indeed strong, but it is not irreplaceable. Lu Ban and Hou Yi are the same. In the early stage, Garro consumed a lot of blue. The whole is weaker than Luban and Houyi, so it is exaggerated to say that it can be replaced completely. It depends on personal preferences.