Sihai network

The case of Zhoukou baby boy lost is a self directing and self acting case. What's the legal respons

Since the baby boy was lost on May 16, netizens have paid close attention to the progress of the incident. Yesterday, it was reported that the baby was found safely, which made many people feel relieved and wait for the final investigation results. However, on May 20, things took a big turn. It turns out that the loss of a baby boy is a play. What's the matter with the loss of a baby boy's self directing and self acting? Should the baby boy be legally responsible for the loss of his self directing and self acting? Let's take a look.

What's going on when the baby boy loses his self directing and self acting

Today (May 20), according to media reports, it was learned from the sources of people familiar with the matter that the incident of the baby lost in Zhoukou, Henan Province was a case in which the mother of a baby boy, due to family conflicts, planned a "self directing and self acting" with her relatives and friends. At present, many people involved in the planning have been detained. The mother of the baby is still lactating and will be dealt with after the lactation.

In this regard, an insider who claimed to be a friend of the baby's mother was interviewed by Red Star News. The insider once participated in the search for the lost baby boy. In response to the current online report of "self directing and self acting", the other party told Red Star News: 'please give me a few days to calm down. I believe that people are doing things and watching things. I am just and comfortable. '

Since May 16, the news that a 4-month-old baby boy was carried away when his mother fainted on the roadside in Zhoukou City, Henan Province, has been widely concerned by people all over the country. People are paying attention to the progress of the matter and praying that the poor child can go home safely. Finally, the child was successfully recovered on the 19th, people's hearts were finally put down, but more doubts surfaced.

On the 19th, the child went home safely. However, the police did not say a word about the details of the case. They only said that the child was safe, and the words were 'the lost baby boy was recovered' instead of 'the stolen baby boy was rescued'. 'This subtle difference has aroused people's suspicion. Some netizens pointed out that the incident was too strange: it happened that they fainted in the blind area of surveillance, and no one found it for an hour. The baby carriage was covered tightly in the surveillance, and they didn't really see the children. The police took the surveillance video from the nearby road section to check it one by one, but they never found any suspicious person. Local people have been forwarding, love organizations on the street to distribute notices looking for people, and anxious families even raised the reward to 150000 yuan. This familiar plot reminds people of the disappearance of Yueqing boy at the end of 2018. Isn't it a farce directed and performed by ourselves?

Should a baby boy bear legal responsibility for losing his self directing and acting

After it was confirmed that Yueqing boy lost contact was directed and acted by his mother, a lawyer explained in detail the "false police situation". According to the lawyer, there is no doubt that this is a false report to the police. Article 25 of the law of the people's Republic of China on administrative penalties for public security has relevant provisions. In this case, administrative detention of not less than five days but not more than 10 days and a fine of not more than 500 yuan can be imposed. If the situation is serious and causes serious disturbance to social order, it can also be raised to the height of criminal law. If he knows that it is false information and intentionally spreads it on the Internet, he violates the second paragraph of article 291-1 of the criminal law: if he fabricates or intentionally spreads false information and seriously disturbs social order, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance; if serious consequences are caused, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years. The lawyer also pointed out that if family members still help each other in series, such as making false police or deliberately concealing, they should bear the responsibility.

After the child was recovered, the father of the child expressed his gratitude for the concern of the society, while the child's relatives also expressed their hope that the matter would stop here. But how can public feelings be played and hurt at will, and how can the bottom line of the law be touched at will? The mother of Yueqing boy was sentenced to one year and three months' imprisonment on April 29 for fabricating and deliberately spreading false information. Only 17 days later, the same incident happened again, waiting for these people, will also be the severe punishment of the law!