Sihai network

How does Betta complain about tiger teeth 23 times? Why does Betta complain about tiger teeth

How did Betta complain about tiger teeth 23 times? Why did Betta complain about tiger teeth? Many friends still don't know. Let's take a look with Xiaobian.

How does Betta complain about tiger teeth 23 times

The smoke of the game live platform continues. On March 8, 2018, Tencent invested exclusively in Huya and douyu platforms on the same day, with douyu getting us $630 million and Huya getting us $461.6 million. It has basically established their leading positions in the live game industry.

Subsequently, the industry came out of the two platforms listed news. In May 2018, Huya successfully went public in the United States, with a total market value of US $5.321 billion (equivalent to RMB 35.76 billion) as of March 28. But the fight fish aspect has been preparing for war, recently in the industry once again spreads its soon to start the IPO procedure the news. In an interview with reporters, Betta said it would not comment.

In any case, in the past year, the game live industry has never stopped fighting. Recently, a civil ruling issued by the people's Court of Nansha District in Guangzhou revealed the tip of the iceberg.

Douyu's 23 complaints were counterclaim by Huya

On August 30, 2018, apple sent an email to Guangzhou Huya Information Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Huya"), saying that Wuhan yuxingtianxia Cultural Media Co., Ltd. complained that two applications of Huya infringed its intellectual property rights. In particular, the complainants believe that you are infringing their copyright. The two applications involved are 'tiger teeth live - game interactive live' and 'Hd - game interactive live platform'.

According to public information, Wuhan yuxingtianxia culture media Co., Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wuhan douyu Yule Network Technology Co., Ltd., whose shareholder is douyu (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. and its legal representative is Chen Shaojie, founder of douyu. Based on this, this paper takes Wuhan yuxingtianxia culture media Co., Ltd. for short as "douyu".

According to the ruling, douyu believes that it has signed a brokerage contract with three anchors including Zhang Fuhai and Wu Xinyuan, and the copyright of audio and video produced by the anchor within the validity period of the contract is owned by douyu. Huya spread it without authorization and asked Apple store to remove its app.

According to statistics, Betta has made 23 complaints, all of which urged Apple store to remove Huya app on the grounds of 'infringement and unfair competition'. "In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of our company, we request that tiger teeth live be removed from Apple App store as soon as possible. "Once again, we're asking for tiger teeth live to be removed from Apple's app store as soon as possible. '

In the face of Betta's complaint, tiger tooth responded very strongly. The company said 'the anchor involved has terminated the cooperative relationship with Betta. '

According to the ruling, Hu Ya provided the statements of the three anchors involved in the case. Among them, Zhang Fuhai said, "due to the prior breach of contract by Betta, I have terminated my cooperation with Betta since July 2018, and terminated all the licensing of the platform. Betta has no right to use its works in any name. '

Court finds unfair competition

Ask Betta to stop complaining

In response to the case, the court held that the application for preservation of action of Huya company should be supported. After being aware of the authorization document submitted by Huya company, douyu still complains. It shows that the behavior of Betta complaint is continuous and does not stop until the purpose of complaint is realized.

'the rights involved in the dispute are limited to the scope authorized by the three anchors, and it is not only the three anchors who live broadcast on the two applications involved in the case. In douyu's complaint email, apple is required to delete the live broadcast program of Huya every time. The purpose is not just to ask Huya to stop using the relevant content of the three anchors involved in the case, but to make Huya in apple The whole live application on the store is deleted, so as to eliminate competitors and occupy market share. This behavior is not justified. This is what the ruling says.

The court ruled that in the aspect of fighting fish, complaints against the two applications of tiger tooth company on related matters were stopped, and the ruling was executed immediately after it was delivered. How does Betta complain about tiger teeth 23 times

Betta told reporters that the case has been applied for reconsideration.

'I think this case is of great significance, and even creates a precedent for preventing unfair competition. In an interview with reporters, Zhao Ming, partner of Beijing Zhongtong law firm, said that in the past, property preservation was widely used in China, and there was no statement of behavior preservation in terms of intellectual property rights. It was not until the end of December 2018 that the supreme law issued a relevant judicial interpretation. This interpretation began to be formally implemented on January 1, 2019. This case is based on this judicial interpretation, which may be the first case in China to apply this article, so it is of great significance.

He said that 'behavior preservation' can maximize the protection of the injured party in unfair competition. Specifically, in this case, if the unfair competition means of fighting fish continue, it may cause Huya app to be taken off the shelf and cause financial losses. It is a common means of unfair competition for Betta to put pressure on apple in one way but not bring a lawsuit. Behavior preservation can effectively restrain this behavior, and the protection of intellectual property rights in China will be more and more perfect in the future. '

As for the current pattern of the live game industry, an Internet analyst, who did not want to be named, said in an interview with reporters that although Huya was listed earlier and more prominent, from the perspective of monthly life and market share, the two sides should be equally matched, and it is difficult to decide whether to win or lose in the short term. The struggle of 'live game brother' will be carried out throughout the year.

From the current financial situation, at the beginning of this month, the financial report disclosed by Huya showed that last year, the annual revenue of Huya live broadcast was 4.663 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 113.4%, and the annual net profit was 461 million yuan, which turned losses compared with 2017. According to the monitoring data of relevant departments of Wuhan East Lake high tech Zone, Beiwan new vision network showed that the income of Betta exceeded 4 billion yuan in 2018. However, the betta side did not respond to the claim of 4 billion yuan.