With the continuous improvement of China's social system, the level of the national economy is also rising year by year. People begin to have different views on the way of providing for the aged. Now, the way of providing for the aged is diversified, and it is not just the need for institutions such as "nursing homes and nursing homes" to provide a reliable place for the problem of providing for the aged. So what do you think of the better comparison between "family pension" and "social pension" on the Internet?
@Meteor shower: of course, family pension is better, but it should be built on the condition that the children are filial and have good economic conditions. Otherwise, they can only go to the nursing home to provide for the aged. If they don't have the money to go to the nursing home or hire a nanny to take care of them, they will have to live and die. I'm not exaggerating at all. I'm not pessimistic at all. I hope I can take care of myself when I am old, and I can depend on myself if I want to live.
@Princess Sun: it's better to have a family. Even if the family conditions are not good, the old people are reluctant to go to the nursing home. Children need to understand the mood of the old man. Now they are in their sixties and live a long life for more than twenty or thirty years. In this few twenties and thirties, the old man will be happy with filial piety. No matter how good the conditions are, the old people still don't understand that they think their children are not filial.
@Fragrant happiness: family pension is the choice of most people in our current situation. Being taken care of and needed by several generations at home will help the elderly find their self-worth, especially when they are together with vigorous children. At present, social pension is still in the exploration stage. There are not many pension institutions, and their qualifications are uneven. More time is needed to improve them.
@Cherry blossom in full bloom: family pension and social pension have their own advantages. Family pension children in front of, do not need a lot of money, there is a sense of home, but children have to sacrifice time. Social pension does not need children's care, but it needs a certain economic basis.
@A sad song: it's better to provide for the aged at home, because it's the relatives who are taking care of it, which is much better than the elderly in the nursing home. There's family affection at home, and it's their own children who are taking care of the elderly. They must be more responsible and caring for the elderly than the nursing workers in the nursing home.
It can be seen that many people will almost choose family pension, and also say that social pension is being explored. I don't think it's really reliable to raise children and prevent the elderly. It's a tradition since ancient times to let my son provide for the elderly. Of course, there are also his shortcomings. For example, his own children, life is difficult, mud Bodhisattva cross the river, self preservation is difficult, how to manage you, maybe he will gnaw old. So, it's better to be self-sufficient or choose social pension.
To this end, experts say that there is a difference between family pension and social pension: the current social welfare system is not perfect enough, and the Chinese population is really too many. If we blindly implement this social welfare system, maybe within a few years, the financial collapse will occur. The family pension is based on the premise of having children, and the empty nest elderly without children can only choose social pension, which is no choice. Which of these two is better, can not be evaluated, because each person's family situation and income situation are different, so different from each other, the advantages and disadvantages of self-knowledge!