Sihai network

The car killed a dog without a rope instead of a second responsibility. The owner is fully responsib

Recently, in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, a non tethered pet dog ran into the road and was killed. The female owner said she was held responsible by the traffic police and asked for 3000 yuan compensation by the owner of Samoye. On May 30, @ Xiangshan traffic police informed that the # car killed the dog without tether, which was changed to the secondary responsibility #, and the dog owner was responsible. The two sides have also reached an agreement on economic compensation.

On May 28, Yiwang Youfa, Xiangshan County, Ningbo, Zhejiang, said that on May 24, on his normal driving, a white Samoye suddenly rushed into the road, could not dodge and killed the dog, and was claimed 3000 yuan by the dog owner. The netizen said that Xiangshan traffic police issued a responsibility identification letter to identify the main responsibility of the owner and the secondary responsibility of the dog owner. The division of responsibility for hitting a pet dog while driving has aroused heated discussion among netizens.

In this regard, the traffic police brigade of Xiangshan County Public Security Bureau in Ningbo, Zhejiang reported on the 30th that after a comprehensive re investigation, it was found that the identification of responsibility for the accident was inconsistent with the facts. Xiangshan Traffic Police Brigade revoked the identification of the accident on May 30 and made a re identification on the same day: the small car Party (Wu) bears the secondary responsibility for the accident and the owner of the pet dog (Chen) Take the main responsibility for the accident. At present, the two sides have also reached an agreement on economic compensation.

On May 24, a female car owner in Xiangshan County, Ningbo was driving when a white dog without a rope suddenly ran off the sidewalk, runway and road. The netizen couldn't dodge and killed the dog. The netizen's dash cam video showed that when the dog rushed out, the female owner screamed and stopped the car.

The female owner tweeted that the dog owner said she needed to compensate 3000 yuan, while the female owner thought that she could compensate up to 2000 yuan. On the 29th, Ms. Chen, the owner, told the Beiqing daily that Xiangshan traffic police believed that the owner should take measures, but they did not take measures. They identified the owner as the main responsibility and the dog owner as the secondary responsibility. On the confirmation of road traffic responsibility of the traffic police brigade of Xiangshan County Public Security Bureau presented by Ms. Chen, the column "traffic accident facts" reads, "car a drove south to north, collided with a dog on the road, and the dog rope was not pulled."

The police reported that on the evening of May 24, 2019, a small car collided with a pet dog at the intersection of Vientiane road and dannan road in Xiangshan County, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, resulting in the death of the pet dog. The Dancheng squadron of the traffic police brigade of Xiangshan County Public Security Bureau made a determination according to the statements of both parties and the summary procedure. The car Party (Wu) was responsible for the accident and the other party (Chen) was responsible for the accident. Both parties expressed no objection and signed the determination letter. Later, because the car Party raised an objection to the responsibility determination of the accident, the accident squadron of Xiangshan Traffic Police Brigade checked the car Party's tachograph video, and after a comprehensive investigation, it was found that the responsibility determination of the accident was inconsistent with the facts. Xiangshan Traffic Police Brigade revoked the accident determination on May 30 and made a new determination on the same day: small car Party (Wu) Bear the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the owner of the pet dog (Chen) bears the primary responsibility for the accident. At present, the two sides have also reached an agreement on economic compensation.