Sihai network

Icebreaker director apologizes and responds to bug! The director told the truth and gave five explan

With the broadcast of 45 and 46 episodes of the popular drama "ice breaking action", the controversy among netizens is becoming more and more intense. The chaotic entry of the hostess Chen Ke and the existence of various bugs in the plot can be described as difficult for many netizens. This can well reflect the changes in the hearts of the audience from the scoring trend of ice breaking action in Douban. Not long ago, the director of ice breaking apologized and responded to the bug! The director told the truth and gave five explanations

In fact, the main reasons for these problems questioned by netizens are the chain events triggered by 'Ma Wen was shot'. First, is Li Fei's choice optimal, and second, is this conflict play necessary and will it have an impact on the whole 'ice breaking operation'? Third, as a general nurse, why did Chen Ke behave unprofessionally when hemostatic for Ma Wen? Next, the little shopkeeper will take you to see how Director Fu Dongyu explains.

To tell the truth, after watching the director's five explanations for the two episodes, except for the third, the other four are difficult to convince the public. First of all, the first two explanations for mobile phones are very reluctant, because Li Fei has talked to Lin Zonghui with Lin Lan's mobile phone more than once without being found. Secondly, we should talk about the control of the whole operation. Then Li Fei broke into the tower stronghold with several people and was shot at Ma Wen. Will such a big movement not affect the overall operation? It's obviously hard to explain! Then, I think Li Fei's choice can be explained. After all, the character portrayal is diverse. Whether it's a warm-blooded impulse or calm and wise wisdom, it is a reflection of the character's character, which is very consistent with Li Fei's personality in the play. As for the last explanation, it's a little meaningful. Is it the reason for the trial? Or do you have to throw the pot? I'm afraid only the director himself knows!

What's more interesting is that the director didn't mention Chen Ke, the role that the audience has been worried about all the time, which inevitably makes people doubt that she is' bringing money into the Group '! In fact, I can understand the logic loopholes and role errors. After all, the screenwriter is also a person and can't be perfect. But if the existence of the protagonist in a play is meaningless, it is really very problematic!