Sihai network

What's wrong with pinduoduo suing bad reviews? Why did pinduoduo sue for bad reviews

What's wrong with pinduoduo suing bad reviews? Why did pinduoduo sue for bad reviews? On May 27, sina science and technology reported that in response to the recent release of "pinduoduo store has become a gambling website money laundering platform, single store launders 500000 yuan a day!" by the marketing agency "bad review" Reproduced from the webmaster's home, pinduoduo official said that the content of the article is false, causing great loss of goodwill to pinduoduo, and will initiate legal proceedings against the marketing agency, claiming 10 million yuan.

Previously, the 'bad review' published an article saying that there were shops gambling on pinduoduo platform. Many of the respondents responded to the report, saying that the article published by the marketing organization has written and stated hearsay and exaggerated writing and statement without any verification of the so-called 'facts'. By ignoring the combination of WeChat and Alipay, the platform has been attacked under the guidance of relevant government departments. Maliciously exaggerate and belittle the reputation of pinduoduo company. In this regard, pinduoduo hopes that the final law can return the company's innocence.

The person in charge said that the main hope of suspected illegal gambling and money laundering transactions is to break through the payment channel, so it will "lay codes" on all current e-commerce platforms, hoping to mix with normal transactions. For all e-commerce platforms, the difficulty lies in the need to separate them from normal e-commerce transactions and screen them mainly based on the risk control data of Payment institutions. Therefore, as Alipay, as an electronic business platform that does not have its own payment channels, relies solely on the third party payment channel, as long as WeChat receives payment or pays all the wind control suspicious transaction hints, it will freeze the shops and shelves products for the first time and submit relevant clues to the relevant departments.

background records show that all stores mentioned in the article are blocked by the risk control system before the article is published.