The new year is coming soon, and there will be a performance climax for the mobile phone market. Many people will choose to change their mobile phones during the new year, and many people will give their mobile phones as gifts to their family and friends. Mobile phone performance is the most concerned point when many people change mobile phones. So which Android machines have the best performance now? This article brings you the latest Android mobile phone performance ranking for your reference.
Just in January, the mobile phone industry began to smell of gunsmoke. A large number of flagship mobile phones, such as Xiaomi, Samsung, Huawei and ov, are preparing their flagship products in the first half of the year, and the competition may be more intense than before.
Before the arrival of these flagship, we counted the ranking of Android medium and high-end mobile phones in December 2019 according to the background database of anrabbit, and let's see which mobile phones will be on the list in the last issue of this year.
The statistical time of this list is from December 1 to December 31. The scores in the list are the average scores rather than the highest scores, and the data statistics of single model & gt; 1000 pieces, and the data are calculated based on anrabbit V8 version.
1. Let's take a look at the performance ranking of Android flagship phones:
The mobile phone that won the first place this month is vivo iqoo Neo 855 racing Version (8 + 128GB version), while the second and third are also vivo models, vivo iqoo Pro 5g (8 + 256gb version) and nex 3 5g (8 + 256gb version). All three new models are equipped with Xiaolong 855 Plus + UFS 3.0 flash memory, with average scores of 504432, 499446 and 498596 respectively. From the release time, Iqoo Neo 855 racing version is the last Xiaolong 855 plus model released in 2019, so it has more time to optimize SOC.
With the development of mobile phone performance, it can not be determined by simple stacking configuration, but also assisted by software. For example, the above three models are optimized at the software level such as turbo write, HPB technology and monster compilation enhancement technology. At the same time, a variety of heat dissipation technologies are built, which can keep the SOC running at high frequency for a long time, Therefore, these three models have achieved better performance than the ordinary Xiaolong 855 plus model.
Then simply say that the first ranked vivo iqoo Neo 855 racing version is not much different from its predecessor Neo. It mainly upgrades Xiaolong 855 to Xiaolong 855 plus. Other configurations are basically the same. It can only be said to be a bucket, but not a flagship.
So why ranked first? There are two main reasons. First, the vivo iqoo Neo 855 racing version adopts the same UFS 3.0 + f2fs file system as nex 3 5g, so the storage score of the former has been greatly improved.
Another reason is that the GPU driver of nex 3 5g is not the latest version. As we mentioned earlier, the release time of vivo iqoo Neo 855 racing version is late, and its GPU driver is the new version, so the average score of 3D exceeds nex 3 5g. As for iqoo Pro 5g, which ranked second, it also upgraded the new version of GPU driver, and its 3D score also exceeded nex 3 5g, but its storage score was lower than vivo iqoo Neo 855 racing version and nex 3 5g, so it ranked second.
However, in terms of overall performance, if nex 3 5g upgrades all the latest GPU drivers, its performance will surpass iqoo Neo 855 racing version and iqoo Pro 5g again.
In the fourth and fifth place are the one plus mobile phone 7T (8 + 256gb version) and the one plus mobile phone 7T pro (8 + 256gb version). Both brothers use a 90hz refresh rate screen and are equipped with Xiaolong 855 Plus + UFS 3.0 flash memory. Their average scores are 493517 and 492333 respectively, with almost the same score. Moreover, thanks to the high refresh rate screen support, their UX score is significantly higher than that of the model with 60Hz screen.
Finally, the sixth and tenth models are Rog game phone 2 8 + 128GB Version (491167 points), glory V30 Pro 5g 8 + 256gb Version (487969 points), realm x2 Pro 8 + 128GB Version (482456 points), black shark game phone 2 Pro 12 + 256gb Version (480672 points) and Xiaomi 9 Pro 5g 12 + 512gb Version (480333 points).
Among them, glory V30 Pro 5g entered the performance list for the first time this month and entered the seventh place instead of Huawei mate 30 Pro 5g, which ranked 10th last month. It seems that Kirin 990 5g still has a lot of room for optimization.
The above is the performance list of Android flagship phones in December. From the list, we can see that blindly stacking is not a wise move and can not give full play to the best performance of SOC. It still needs software to dig deeper and match software and hardware.
2. Then comes the performance ranking of midrange mobile phones:
It should be noted in advance that Xiaolong 765G, Tianji 1000L and exynos 980 belong to the new generation of mid-range SOC in terms of running score. Tianji 1000L is not on the shelf in this list. The main reason is that at present, only oppo reno3 is on sale, and its data statistics do not reach & gt; 1000, so it is not included in the list. PS: it is expected to see the result ranking of Tianji 1000L next month.
When it comes to the performance ranking of mid-range mobile phones, the first one is vivo x30 Pro 5g (8 + 128GB version), equipped with exynos 980 SOC, with an average score of 327527. It is the first mid-range 5g SOC with a77 architecture, and the GPU is mali-g76 MP5, not G77 architecture. Therefore, from the perspective of parameters, its performance is not as good as Tianji 1000L.
Vivo x30 Pro 5g brings a new funtouch OS 10. The software level adds vivo process daemon technology VPG, which is mainly used to repair the blocking probability of daily applications. In addition, from the sub results, the machine should use single channel UFS 2.1 flash memory. In fact, X series does not pursue much performance. After all, it focuses on photo performance.
The second place is oppo reno3 Pro 5g (8 + 128GB version) equipped with Xiaolong 765G, with an average score of 318328. The biggest improvement of Xiaolong 765G is the integration of 5g baseband and and 7Nm EUV process, which is the largest upgrade of Xiaolong 7 series since its release.
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that oppo reno3 Pro 5g is equipped with dual channel UFS 2.1 flash memory, and the storage score of sub scores is higher than that of vivo x30 Pro 5g.
The third, fourth and fifth place is the Kirin 810 model, which are glory 9x pro (8 + 256gb version), glory 20s (6 + 128GB version) and glory 9x (6 + 128GB version), with average scores of 310398, 301086 and 300496 respectively.
Previously, we have compared the performance of exynos 980, Xiaolong 765G and Kirin 810, and concluded that the performance gap of the three SOCS is not too large, which can be considered as products of the same level. The difference is that both exynos 980 and Xiaolong 765G are 5g SOC, while Kirin 810 is 4G SOC.
It can be predicted that this year's Huawei and glory mid-range models will reduce the emergence of Kirin 810 and replace it with a new generation of Kirin mid-range SOC. It is certain to support 5g. After all, the outbreak of 5g mobile phones this year is a foregone conclusion.
In addition to the above models, redmi note 8 pro (version 8 + 128GB), redmi K30 (version 8 + 128GB), Xiaomi cc9 pro (version 8 + 128GB), oppo reno2 (version 8 + 128GB), realm X2 (version 8 + 128GB) and other models have entered the top 10 of the list.
It can be seen from the midrange mobile phone performance list that, unlike the flagship software and hardware optimization, most of the midrange mobile phone performance is determined by SOC performance, followed by flash memory. There is less assistance from the software level. The reason is very simple. In terms of midrange mobile phone performance, it is better to directly stack materials rather than spend time on software optimization.
The above is the performance ranking of Android mobile phones in December. It should be noted that the above models may not be the top version of the whole system. Theoretically, the top version has better running points due to higher storage configuration, but it cannot be listed due to the insufficient number of effective samples.
Finally, in the next two months, Qualcomm has released its latest flagship SOC Xiaolong 865, and Xiaolong 865 has entered mass production. The release is imminent. It can be confirmed that in the next two months, we will see the models equipped with Xiaolong 865 appear in the performance list. Please look forward to it.