Recently, a report on adjusting the structure of corn cultivation issued by Zhouxi village, Kaili City, Guizhou Province, has been on the Internet. Tell the rules to stop the cultivation of corn in many places in the village, and if notified or punished, the three-year cooperative medical subsidy will be exempted.
A wonderful work tells us that there is a kind of inertia of rights. The adjustment of agricultural industrial structure is so "senseless" and shamelessly attached with the subsidy rights and interests of the villagers. Is this really a battle to win the strategic adjustment of the structure of the cultivation industry, or is it to promote the formalistic bureaucracy to the end?
Some people say that good scriptures are broken by crooked mouth and recitation. This may not be all true, but it is not too much. Adjusting the structure is a matter of great importance for the benefit of the country and the people. As long as the work is in place and the understanding is in place, no one will have trouble with the long-term interests. But don't forget one condition: the adjustment of industrial structure is only guidance, and farmers have to decide what to plant and what not to plant. The land is contracted to the farmers, and the management autonomy is in the hands of the farmers. Planting corn is not the "backward production capacity" that needs to be shut down by thunderbolt. Even if "for your own good" in the village, the hands cannot be too long, let alone cross the border.
Good intentions can't do bad things, right can't be too stubborn. As a joke, the shame of this story lies in the following two places: the first place, you said that corn cultivation is not allowed, right as a forward-looking good intention, but it is doubtful that many of the places where corn cultivation is stopped are 'along the road' and 'local areas seen by road scenic spots'. This makes people feel confused: is the adjustment of the agricultural industrial structure for the convenience of 'who' to see the scenery? If we don't fear to speculate with the worst malice: Frankly speaking, it's just a kind of inspection for leaders. If you can see it, don't plant it. If you can't see it, play with it. This kind of formalism is exactly the same 'freestyle' as the painting of green paint on barren mountains.
Second, farmers who grow corn are actually ruthless in linking their behavior to cooperative medical assistance. Who gives this right? Who should enjoy medical assistance? It should be attributed to the contents of the policy and the rules. Even if the village groups pay for it, they can carry out the "bundling and tying" at any time. It is a gift of public welfare. This absurd behavior of the grass-roots organizations is not only against the justice of the program, but also unreasonable. Of course, according to the local response, 'the notice has not been filed and does not conform to the relevant procedures. The Township People's Government shall order it to correct, and now it is informed that the performance has been suspended'. The question is, before the media exposure and scandal came to the ground, did the higher authorities correct it?
Potato, corn, watermelon and cabbage have their own preferences and preferences. Yes, planning and cultivation is the direction, and structural adjustment is the direction. But don't forget that respecting the independent rights and interests of farmers is more reassuring than compulsory economic benefits. I'm afraid that's not the way to win the battle of strategic adjustment of cultivation industry structure. Even if the corn is really extinct, I'm afraid that the people's hearts will be lost, and the worship of the rule of law will be lost. To help the poor, we need to talk about the way, not the routine; to adjust the structure, we need to talk about the rules, not the music. In particular, the road to village rejuvenation is still a long one. There are many public policies and more financial investment. Do not let the formalistic bureaucracy continue to be rich and resourceful.