Sihai network

How to evaluate after 2017 college entrance examination?

After the college entrance examination, the most important thing is to evaluate. What are the skills of evaluation? The 2017 college entrance examination is over, and now you must be eager to know how many points you got. Although they are all volunteers now, many students want to give themselves a reassurance after the answers come out!

College entrance examination assessment skill 1: if you can't remember the answer, you can do it again

Candidates should accurately recall the answers and remember to be realistic.

College entrance examination papers are completed by examinees under high tension. Some examinees can't remember the answers clearly. When they estimate the score, they will have subjective assumptions, which will lead to certain deviation Related article link:

For the inaccurate and uncertain answers, it is suggested that the examinee should meditate alone. If necessary, he / she can try again along the way of solving questions in the examination room, and pay attention to listing the main steps, so that he / she can grasp each score point of the subjective question more accurately.

Skill 2: how to evaluate the objective questions in college entrance examination?

Objective questions are easy to assess. Just compare your answers with your answers. But there is one thing to note. In order to reduce the error between the estimated score and the actual score, we need to reserve a certain score for the objective part, that is, about 2-4 points less than the actual score you estimate. Of course, you don't have to do this if you are sure of the answer to each question.

College entrance examination evaluation skill 3: how to evaluate subjective questions?

It is suggested that the examinees carefully arrange the answers of each subject according to their memory and write them on paper; or simply do the questions again to restore the situation of the college entrance examination, and then check the answers one by one. The following is a detailed introduction to the science and Technology Department: relevant article link:

1. Composition evaluation

Composition in Chinese subjects, accounting for 60 points. In the case of no writing off the topic, candidates can refer to the usual assessment score of composition in the simulation test, and the range is generally between 45 and 50.

English is more difficult to estimate is also composition, it is recommended to estimate the score according to their own usual situation, usually better candidates can play a little higher, the average score should be evaluated a little lower realistically.

2. Evaluation of science calculation questions

First, check whether the results are consistent with the answers. If they are the same, the principles used and the problem-solving specifications are OK, even if they are right; if the final result is not correct, but the thinking is OK, you can add points by referring to the answers step by step.

Some examinees mistakenly think that as long as the answer is right, they can get full marks, but in fact, they are not. If the answer is correct and the steps are incomplete, the score should be appropriately deducted; if the answer is not correct, as long as some of the steps are implemented, the score can also be scored, but in this case, the score should be evaluated at a lower level. If the answer method is inconsistent with the "reference answer", it is better to ask the teacher for guidance Related article link:

3. Assessment of liberal arts questions

We should pay attention to the principle of "scoring by stepping on points", not necessarily to "dig" the answers completely, nor to write more answers and get higher scores. As long as we grasp the scoring points, the key words are basically the same as the answers, and we can get high scores in three words and two words, if not all, we will get less points, if not, we will not give points. But pay attention to the degree.

In general, candidates need to evaluate 3 points, the first is based on normal evaluation, appropriate tightness and width; the second is based on loose evaluation, that is to say, a little looseness, which includes the "ambiguity" that can not be obtained; the third is based on tight evaluation, that is, a little tighter, which does not include the "ambiguity" that can not be obtained. For a considerable number of candidates, only simple processing and calculating the arithmetic average score of three times can be done; however, for some candidates, it is necessary to analyze the specific situation and choose to use.