Original title: 2018 learning experience of the two sessions
The two sessions play a very important role in promoting China's social and economic development. Learning from the spirit of the two sessions is a must for every member and every staff member of our party. Xiaobian arranges some experience models about the spirit of the two sessions. Let's learn from them.
2018 study the spirit and thought report model of the two sessions [1]
Dear party organization:
Focusing on people's livelihood to promote social equity and justice and build a harmonious society are the core issues of this year's two sessions, as well as the theme of the government work report. This is an important move by the highest authority of our country to transform the ruling program of "new social deal" determined by the Sixth Plenary Session of the party last year into national measures and government functions. After the government work report is approved by the conference, it will be recognized as the leading function of the government in law to expand administrative payment to maintain social fairness and justice. Then, the administrative organization system, the allocation of functions and authorities, the administrative decision-making, the administrative execution, the administrative supervision and relief and the relevant legislation will make necessary adjustments.
The adjustment of administrative law to the above content is also the process of constructing 'social administrative law' in China. The so-called social administrative law is an administrative law type with the function of maintaining fairness and justice of the government as its content. Its core concept is the social rights of citizens and the beneficial rights of other public laws, as well as the administrative payment behavior of the government providing social welfare and public services to the society. In combination with the spirit of the "two sessions" paying close attention to people's livelihood, and centering on these two core concepts, social administrative law will also provide a new structure and system of administrative law.
First of all, we should strengthen the protection of collective beneficial rights and improve the administrative decision-making mechanism of public affairs. The dominant aspect of administrative payment is that the government provides universal and sustainable social welfare and public services. First of all, it should satisfy the collective beneficial right of citizens, which is reflected in the public decision-making of social welfare and service in administrative activities. For example, the establishment of public facilities such as transportation, communication, science and technology, education, medical treatment and sports, or the establishment of public projects to support the development of science and technology and increase the state expenditure on medical insurance are all the sustainable public welfare and public service measures provided by the government for the whole society.
The system measures of social administrative law to protect the social collective welfare right are mainly to introduce the participation system of the public and the interested groups in the public decision-making process. Furthermore, it is to form the basic system framework of social administrative law through the binding force of participation subject, participation procedure and participants' opinions on Administrative decision-making, so as to achieve the purpose of administration according to law.
At the same time, the public welfare and public service provided by the government can be divided into absolute collective benefit and relative individual benefit. Absolute collective benefit can not be divided into individual benefit claims, such as improving the environmental protection standards of drinking water and air, improving the health and safety standards of food, and stipulating the teaching content of Ideological and moral courses in school education and the public morality level of public entertainment programs.
In this regard, the social administrative law should start from the height of a harmonious society, take the people's livelihood as the guide, and constantly provide an increasingly perfect system framework, with the focus on standardizing the performance of the administrative organs. For example, the administrative law will strictly prohibit the interception of the township government and the village committee in the name of the public. For the financial support of compulsory education, the administrative law stipulates that Set up the corresponding administrative payment system, so that students with local household registration but studying in different places can effectively benefit.
We should also improve the legal supervision and right relief system to protect the beneficial rights of public law. Traditionally, the main form of administrative law protection for the general social collective interests is the legal supervision of state organs, public institutions and public opinion. No matter in administrative litigation or in administrative reconsideration, the settlement mechanism of administrative disputes of legal procedure does not extend to the disputes of general social collective interests.
One of the main reasons is that the qualification of the prosecutor is strictly limited to the direct relevance of their own interests. Therefore, there are endless appeals for public welfare administrative litigation, such as administrative cases on state-owned assets and environmental protection, but no response from the decision-making organs. This means that the behavior of administrative organs to make decisions and orders and administrative policies with universal binding force is the exclusive right of administrative organs which can be separated from judicial constraints.
Although according to the provisions of the legislative law, the administrative rules and regulations of the administrative rules and regulations making procedure introduce the public participation mechanism such as hearing, but the public participation opinions have no legal binding effect on the administrative decision-making, and there is no judicial protection mechanism for the right to participate. This kind of situation can't meet the needs of the administrative organ to fulfill the obligation of administrative payment. It will make the social payment function of the administrative organ stay on the random cheap measures of "doing good things" and "doing practical things" to a certain extent, rather than the stable and continuous administrative function and the legal obligation that must be performed.
Therefore, we should continue to improve the legal supervision system of administrative activities, while expanding the purpose of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation system. They should not only protect the individual rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, but also include the social collective rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations in the scope of protection. The inaction of administrative organs should be the focus of social administrative law to correct administrative violations.
Best regards
Salute
Reported by: XXX
On XX, 2018, the NPC and the CPPCC have a great role in promoting China's social and economic development. Learning from the spirit of the NPC and the CPPCC is a must for every member and every staff member of our party. Xiaobian arranges some experience models about the spirit of the two sessions. Let's learn from them.
2018 study the spirit and thought report model of the two sessions [1]
Dear party organization:
Focusing on people's livelihood to promote social equity and justice and build a harmonious society are the core issues of this year's two sessions, as well as the theme of the government work report. This is an important move by the highest authority of our country to transform the ruling program of "new social deal" determined by the Sixth Plenary Session of the party last year into national measures and government functions. After the government work report is approved by the conference, it will be recognized as the leading function of the government in law to expand administrative payment to maintain social fairness and justice. Then, the administrative organization system, the allocation of functions and authorities, the administrative decision-making, the administrative execution, the administrative supervision and relief and the relevant legislation will make necessary adjustments.
The adjustment of administrative law to the above content is also the process of constructing 'social administrative law' in China. The so-called social administrative law is an administrative law type with the function of maintaining fairness and justice of the government as its content. Its core concept is the social rights of citizens and the beneficial rights of other public laws, as well as the administrative payment behavior of the government providing social welfare and public services to the society. In combination with the spirit of the "two sessions" paying close attention to people's livelihood, and centering on these two core concepts, social administrative law will also provide a new structure and system of administrative law.
First of all, we should strengthen the protection of collective beneficial rights and improve the administrative decision-making mechanism of public affairs. The dominant aspect of administrative payment is that the government provides universal and sustainable social welfare and public services. First of all, it should satisfy the collective beneficial right of citizens, which is reflected in the public decision-making of social welfare and service in administrative activities. For example, the establishment of public facilities such as transportation, communication, science and technology, education, medical treatment and sports, or the establishment of public projects to support the development of science and technology and increase the state expenditure on medical insurance are all the sustainable public welfare and public service measures provided by the government for the whole society.
The system measures of social administrative law to protect the social collective welfare right are mainly to introduce the participation system of the public and the interested groups in the public decision-making process. Furthermore, it is to form the basic system framework of social administrative law through the binding force of participation subject, participation procedure and participants' opinions on Administrative decision-making, so as to achieve the purpose of administration according to law.
At the same time, the public welfare and public service provided by the government can be divided into absolute collective benefit and relative individual benefit. Absolute collective benefit can not be divided into individual benefit claims, such as improving the environmental protection standards of drinking water and air, improving the health and safety standards of food, and stipulating the teaching content of Ideological and moral courses in school education and the public morality level of public entertainment programs.
In this regard, the social administrative law should start from the height of a harmonious society, take the people's livelihood as the guide, and constantly provide an increasingly perfect system framework, with the focus on standardizing the performance of the administrative organs. For example, the administrative law will strictly prohibit the interception of the township government and the village committee in the name of the public. For the financial support of compulsory education, the administrative law stipulates that Set up the corresponding administrative payment system, so that students with local household registration but studying in different places can effectively benefit.
We should also improve the legal supervision and right relief system to protect the beneficial rights of public law. Traditionally, the main form of administrative law protection for the general social collective interests is the legal supervision of state organs, public institutions and public opinion. No matter in administrative litigation or in administrative reconsideration, the settlement mechanism of administrative disputes of legal procedure does not extend to the disputes of general social collective interests.
One of the main reasons is that the qualification of the prosecutor is strictly limited to the direct relevance of their own interests. Therefore, there are endless appeals for public welfare administrative litigation, such as administrative cases on state-owned assets and environmental protection, but no response from the decision-making organs. This means that the behavior of administrative organs to make decisions and orders and administrative policies with universal binding force is the exclusive right of administrative organs which can be separated from judicial constraints.
Although according to the provisions of the legislative law, the administrative rules and regulations of the administrative rules and regulations making procedure introduce the public participation mechanism such as hearing, but the public participation opinions have no legal binding effect on the administrative decision-making, and there is no judicial protection mechanism for the right to participate. This kind of situation can't meet the needs of the administrative organ to fulfill the obligation of administrative payment. It will make the social payment function of the administrative organ stay on the random cheap measures of "doing good things" and "doing practical things" to a certain extent, rather than the stable and continuous administrative function and the legal obligation that must be performed.
Therefore, we should continue to improve the legal supervision system of administrative activities, while expanding the purpose of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation system. They should not only protect the individual rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, but also include the social collective rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations in the scope of protection. The inaction of administrative organs should be the focus of social administrative law to correct administrative violations.
Best regards
Salute
Reported by: XXX
XX, 2018
2018 study the spirit and thought report model of the two sessions [2]
Dear party organization:
Recently, the two sessions have become a hot topic of common concern for our whole society. As a preparatory Party member, I take the initiative to pay attention to the dynamic development of the two sessions, carefully listen to the relevant reports of the two sessions, carefully read the proposals of each delegation, and reflect on my own actual situation and the community environment in which I live, and here I express some views and feelings.
The two sessions, the abbreviation of the "National People's Congress" and the "Chinese people's Political Consultative Conference", are held once in March every year in succession. They are called one session every five years. The significance of the two sessions is to