How was Wang Baoqiang's divorce judged
&; &; &; &; &; &; &; sihai.com: Recently, the divorce case of Wang Baoqiang, which has attracted the attention of 'melon eaters', has finally come to a conclusion. Since Wang Baoqiang announced the divorce on Weibo, the divorce case has attracted the attention of hundreds of millions of people. The trial time spans three years. So what is the result of Wang Baoqiang's divorce case? How did Wang Baoqiang decide the divorce case? Let's have a look.
In the afternoon of February 11, 2018, Wang Baoqiang v. Ma Rong's divorce case and Ma Rong v. Wang Baoqiang's right of reputation case were heard in closed court in Chaoyang Court, Beijing, respectively, and their judgments were pronounced in court. In the first trial of Wang Baoqiang's divorce case, the court decided to terminate the marriage relationship between the two parties, and from the perspective of promoting the healthy growth of their children, the court decided that their children should be raised by Wang Baoqiang and their daughters should be raised by Ma Rong; in the case of Ma Rong's reputation right, the court decided that Wang Baoqiang did not constitute reputation infringement, and the first trial decision rejected Ma Rong's claim.
In the divorce case of Wang Baoqiang v. Ma Rong, according to the relevant evidence, the court found that Ma Rong had an improper relationship with others outside the marriage, violated the couple's duty of loyalty, and the couple's feelings were broken. The court decided to terminate the marriage relationship, and determined the time and way of children's visit. As for Wang Baoqiang's claim for compensation for mental damage, the court failed to support it because the existing evidence is not enough to prove that Ma Rong cohabited with others and did not conform to the relevant provisions of the marriage law. As for the issue of property division, there are many clues and disputes between the two sides, which need to be further investigated, and the court will deal with it separately according to law.
In the case of Ma Rong v. Wang Baoqiang's right of reputation, the court found that the relevant content of the statement sent by Wang Baoqiang's microblog was basically true, and did not use the language of extreme and insulting others, so it rejected Ma Rong's claim.
During this period, Wang Baoqiang and his lawyers attended the court proceedings.