According to the news on December 19, the legal blogger @ logics sent a document saying that it has sued Tencent to confirm that several terms under the Tencent video super film and television VIP member service agreement are invalid and compensate 500 yuan for economic losses.
@Logics sued Tencent for video advance on demand service. The video platform opened VIP advance on demand for the popular drama Qing Nian.
Opening advance on demand is equivalent to unlocking more episodes on the basis of VIP members. The price of the platform is also clearly marked: VIP members can choose to pay for a single episode, pay 3 yuan per episode, or directly package and unlock it for 50 yuan, and enjoy the privilege of watching 6 episodes more than other VIP users and 12 episodes more than ordinary users.
@Logics said that such obviously unfair and unreasonable terms aroused the anger of the public, in exchange for Tencent's light sentence: it is not considerate enough to grasp the consumption psychology of members. It can be seen that the goose factory believes that it is right to pull out the goose feather, and the mistake is to let the goose bark.
There can never be such absurd terms in a truly free market. However, the goose factory has been lonely at the top of bat for too long. Just as Tencent's legal department is also known as Nanshan pizza hut, I don't know how to lose the lawsuit.
One or two hundred dollars is a small matter, but such unreasonable terms should not continue day after day. I officially announce that I will safeguard my legitimate rights and interests through legal channels, not only for myself, but also for the majority of consumers.
I hope that the court will make the ultimate ruling and promote the fair and orderly development of the film and television service market within the framework of the law. Source: fast technology