2019 is coming to an end. Many new mobile phones have been released in this year. Even at the end of the year, new mobile phones are ready to go. Users who are used to using Android machines must pay great attention to the performance ranking of Android machines. So what about the latest Android phone score? What is the best performance of Android? In this article, let's take a look at the performance ranking of Android phones.
This month, a large wave of 5g mobile phones will be released, including redmi, vivo and oppo. Of course, most of these models are positioned at the medium and high end. Friends looking forward to the flagship aircraft may wish to wait for a new wave of climax after the Spring Festival.
In addition to looking forward to the new machine, we might as well pay attention to the ranking of domestic Android mobile phones in November and see what models will be on the penultimate list of this year.
The statistical time of this list is from November 1 to November 30. The scores in the list are the average scores rather than the highest scores, and the data statistics of single model & gt; 1000 pieces, and the data are calculated based on anrabbit V8 version.
At the same time, in order to facilitate more users to purchase models, anrabbit has joined the performance ranking of mid-range models since last month, and this month is no exception.
First, let's take a look at the list of flagship models:
This month, vivo's two male nex 3 5g (8 + 256gb) and iqoo Pro 5g (8 + 256gb) still ranked in the top two, with average running points of 486432 and 484522 respectively, which performed very well.
The reason why the two can achieve such achievements is inseparable from the strong configuration. They are equipped with Xiaolong 855 plus mobile platform and UFS 3.0 flash memory chip. In terms of software, they are blessed with f2fs file system, turbo write and HPB technology and monster compilation enhancement technology. Therefore, they have achieved better performance than ordinary Xiaolong 855 plus models.
One plus 7T (8 + 256gb) and one plus 7T pro (12 + 256gb) ranked third and fourth this month, with average running scores of 482418 and 482415 respectively.
But why is the running score of one plus 7T pro with stronger configuration almost the same as that of one plus 7T? Here, rabbit can only explain it with different firmware adjustment methods, because by comparing sub scores (sub scores can be found on the detailed page of the list), we can see that one plus 7T performs better in GPU and one plus 7T Pro performs better in storage.
In addition, we can also see from the sub results that since the whole series of one plus 7T adopts 90hz screen, their performance in UX is better than that of models with 60Hz screen.
The top 5-10 are Rog game phone 2 8 + 128GB (average score 480020), realm x2 Pro 12 + 256gb (average score 474668), vivo iqoo Neo 855 8 + 256gb (average score 472304), black shark game phone 2 Pro 12 + 256gb (average score 469403), Xiaomi 9 Pro 5g 12 + 512gb (average score 468838) and Huawei mate 30 Pro 5g 8 + 512gb (average score 461939).
The above is the top 10 performance of anrabbit's flagship mobile phone in November. It is not difficult to see from the list, To reach the top ten, in addition to the flagship SOC (Xiaolong 855 plus or Kirin 990 5g), UFS 3.0 flash memory or high refresh rate screen are also essential (Xiaomi 9 Pro 5g improves performance through greater storage capacity). After all, strong hardware configuration is the basis of running points, and software adjustment can make running points to a higher level.
Next, let's take a look at the ranking of midrange models:
Last month, the monopoly of Kirin 810 chip products in the top three changed again this month. Even the fourth place was monopolized by Kirin 810 chip.
The top four models are glory 9x Pro 8 + 256gb, glory 20s 6 + 128GB, Huawei Nova 5Z 6 + 64GB and glory 9x 6 + 128GB, with average scores of 301107, 296152, 295760 and 292341.
Similarly, with the Kirin 810 chip, why is there an obvious difference in the average running score? By carefully observing the storage configuration, we can find that the storage configuration of the four models on the list is different. Because the anrabbit V8 increases the performance of the storage part, it can better feed back the performance differences caused by different storage.
Redmi note 8 Pro 8 + 128GB ranks fifth. It is also the only product equipped with MediaTek Helio g90t game chip in China. Its average score is 281602, which still lags behind Kirin 810.
Compared with the Kirin 810, the Helio g90t is not inferior in CPU, but there is a certain gap in GPU. In terms of storage, in particular, the Helio g90t only supports single channel UFS flash memory, so there is also a gap compared with the Kirin 810 supporting dual channel UFS flash memory.
The top 6-10 are realme x2 8 + 128GB (average score 258555), Xiaomi cc9 Pro 8 + 128GB (average score 257422), oppo reno2 8 + 128GB (average score 257291), redmi K20 6 + 128GB (average score 251138) and vivo Z5 6 + 256gb (average score 230205).
For midrange models, a relatively strong SOC with UFS flash memory chip is also a necessary condition for listing, and a larger storage configuration or dual channel UFS flash memory is a bonus item.
The above is the performance ranking of Android mobile phones in November. It should be noted that the above models may not be the top version of the whole system. Theoretically, the top version has better running points due to higher storage configuration, but it cannot be listed due to the insufficient number of effective samples.
In addition, running points is just a reference standard when purchasing mobile phones. In fact, it is difficult to present the parts related to the user experience, such as photography, battery life, shape design, hand feeling and so on. Therefore, Ann rabbit recommends that you consider comprehensively when purchasing mobile phones and choose the one that is most suitable for you.