Original title: qunar's response was listed as' Lao Lai 'by the court: wrong operation, has been revoked
Beijing News (reporter Wang Zhenzhen) on October 18, according to media reports, qunar.com was listed as a dishonest executor by the court for refusing to return the deposit and interest. In this regard, qunar.com told the Beijing news that the people's Court of Yongkang City, Zhejiang Province mistakenly included Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. (qunar.com's operation subject) who assumed supplementary responsibility in the list of dishonest Executees. After communication, the enforcement court has corrected this error and cancelled it. The Beijing News reporter found through the China executive information disclosure network that the relevant information of Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. was not queried in the dishonest executee column.
On October 12, tianyancha data showed that Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. was listed as a dishonest executee by Yongkang Municipal People's court because it 'had the ability to perform but refused to perform the obligations determined by the effective legal documents and violated the property reporting system'.
According to the contents of the effective legal documents, the determined obligation is that the executed Shanghai Duba Business Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Duba business") returns the deposit of 150000 yuan to the applicants Jiang, Zhu and Fang, and compensates for the loss of 2060 yuan and interest loss, And Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd., the executee, shall bear the supplementary liability within 50% of the above payment scope of Duba business.
According to the relevant civil judgments queried by the Beijing News reporter on the China judicial documents network, from July to August 2017, Jiang, Zhu and Fang purchased the 6-day tour products of Shanghai Keyou International Travel Agency Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as' Keyou travel agency ') from 10.1 to 10.6 Japan on the qunar platform. On September 19, 2017, qunar's customer service suddenly informed that the three people were required to pay a visa deposit to Japan of 50000 yuan per person and remit it to Duba's business account. On the same day, the three remitted a total of 150000 yuan into Duba's business account through Jiang's personal account. On September 28, 2017, qunar customer service informed that it was necessary to postpone the trip to October 4. Due to the delay, qunar agreed to return the travel group fee difference of RMB 1000 per person, and promised to return the visa deposit and travel difference of RMB 153000 after returning home. After returning home, Jiang, Zhu and Fang contacted where to go for many times, but the customer service was fruitless. On October 30, 2017, Jiang, Zhu and Fang complained to Keyou travel agency, but Keyou travel agency did not handle it. On November 15, 2017, the three filed a lawsuit with the people's Court of Yongkang City, Zhejiang Province. On August 2, 2018, the above case was heard in public.
Yongkang people's Court of Zhejiang Province ruled that Duba business returned 150000 yuan of deposit from Jiang, Zhu and Fang, and compensated 2060 yuan of loss and interest loss. At the same time, it is pointed out that in the above case, the official seal of Shanghai Keyou International Travel Agency Co., Ltd. stamped in the technical platform service agreement provided by Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. is false. Based on the fact that Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Keyou International Travel Agency Co., Ltd. have cooperated for many times and signed several technical platform service agreements, It should be recognized that it has not fulfilled its obligation of careful review on the technical platform service agreement of tourism products involved in the case and its management obligation as a qunar network operator. Therefore, it is also at fault for the losses suffered by Jiang, Zhu and Fang in the case, and should bear the supplementary liability within 50% of the above liability range of Dubai commerce.
Source: Beijing News