Original title: the second instance judgment on the case of a man beating a teacher in the street: maintaining the original judgment and causing trouble was sentenced to one year and six months for Red Star News
The teacher beating case maintains the original judgment. The latest news progress of the teacher beating case
On the morning of August 19, the intermediate people's Court of Luoyang City, Henan Province announced the judgment of the second instance of Chang Renyao's provocation and trouble making case, ruled to reject the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
In the case of Chang Renyao making trouble, the people's Court of Luanchuan County, Henan Province made a judgment of first instance on July 10, 2019, found Chang Renyao guilty of making trouble and sentenced him to fixed-term imprisonment of one year and six months.
After the sentence was pronounced, Chang Renyao appealed, and Luoyang intermediate people's court accepted the case according to law and formed a collegial panel to hear it. The collegial panel reviewed all the files of the case, examined Chang Renyao's appeal and his defender's defense opinions, interrogated Chang Renyao and listened to his defender's opinions, verified the evidence of the whole case, comprehensively reviewed the facts and applicable laws found in the first instance, and fully protected Chang Renyao and his defender's litigation rights. After deliberation by the economic cooperation panel, Luoyang intermediate people's court made a ruling of second instance according to law.
In the ruling of the second instance, Luoyang intermediate people's Court confirmed the facts and evidence found in the first instance. The appellant Chang Renyao intercepted, abused and beat the victim Zhang at will in public places in order to vent his emotions and show off his arrogance. He also arranged for others to record video at the same time, causing many people to watch. Later, Chang Renyao spread his video of beating Zhang to others, which led to widespread concern of social public opinion, seriously affected the work and life of Zhang and his family, and seriously damaged the social code of ethics and public order and good customs. The circumstances are bad, and his behavior has constituted the crime of provocation. The facts determined in the judgment of first instance are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, the conviction is accurate and the sentencing is appropriate. The trial procedure is legal. Chang Renyao's reasons for appeal and his defender's defense opinions are untenable and shall not be adopted. In accordance with paragraph 1, paragraph 1, article 236 of the criminal procedure law of the people's Republic of China, the court ruled to reject the appeal and upheld the original judgment. The ruling is final.