Original title: anti high altitude parabolic, what kind of 'landlord'
Fire fighting equipment fell from the sky, eggs and apples hit the forehead, and glass window frames passed by & hellip& hellip; High altitude parabolic problem is becoming a new 'hidden worry' in urban life. Some media and research institutions have done experiments and calculations: a 50g egg thrown from the fourth floor will hit a swollen bag on the top of the head; If you drop it on the 18th floor, you can break the skull; If it were on the 25th floor, people might die on the spot.
High altitude parabolic and falling objects are new 'urban diseases'. With the increasing density of population, higher and higher houses and older urban buildings, the problem is intensifying. Of course, the "human" factor should not be ignored. Although living in high-rise buildings, some 'landlord' literacy has not been improved at the same time. Searching the China case document network, we can find that since 2010, there have been nearly 1000 legal disputes related to high-altitude parabolic, and the overall trend is on the rise. Overall, the three groups deserve attention. First, some old people who live in cities with their children are used to throwing things outside their homes in rural areas. They live in high-rise buildings without realizing the seriousness of the problem, which is an adaptation problem of modern life; Second, young people who have lived in high-rise buildings for many years sometimes throw away domestic garbage such as takeout and express delivery when it is dark, which is a quality problem; The third is' bear children '. Parents neglect management, children don't know the importance, and the result of lifting heavy objects and throwing them out is to cause accidents, which is an educational problem.
The difficulty of high-altitude parabolic problem is that you are in the light and it is in the dark. To effectively solve it, it is inseparable from the co governance of law, technology and morality. According to China's tort liability law, high-altitude parabolic belongs to the inversion of the burden of proof. If it causes casualties and cannot find the 'culprit', all residents in a building may be liable for compensation. In other words, we are both a security community and a legal community. But generally speaking, China's punishment for high-altitude throwing mostly stays at the level of moral condemnation, administrative punishment and civil compensation, and the cost of 'willfulness' is low. In contrast, in some countries, this problem is much more strict. Even if throwing at high altitude does not cause personal injury, it may be regarded as' endangering public safety ', and it will also face heavy penalties and heavy compensation in civil compensation.
Of course, the law only solves the problem of how to punish. How to do better prevention and supervision? At present, the better experience is to install monitoring. For example, a community in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province has installed 47 anti high-altitude parabolic monitoring, which can accurately 'lock' the target whether it causes an accident or not, and has played a good prevention and control effect. Of course, this has triggered some disputes. Some experts believe that if the owner installs cameras in public areas other than their own residence, it will go beyond the boundary of exercising their rights and may be suspected of violating the privacy of residents upstairs. In other words, the governance cost and coordination cost caused by a toss may be far more than we think.
In the era of high-rise buildings, people are facing more complex vertical space and horizontal space, and the boundary between public space and private space is clearer. Smoking and defecation in elevators, the occupation of fire passages by battery cars and bicycles, and the long-term occupation of corridors by inflammable articles need to be taken seriously. How to help people really adapt to the era of high-rise buildings? Laws and regulations should not be absent, and systems and education should also be present. In terms of high-altitude parabolic, can we send more community security guards to enhance the nursing force? Can we explore the establishment of a 'building director system' in communities with many high-rise buildings and strengthen the force of building patrol? Families and schools should strengthen education and control over the repeated crimes of 'bear children'. As an important lesson in safety education, cultivating children's safety awareness and responsibility awareness is one and two sides. The quality of modern residents really needs to start with dolls.
When the urbanization process is still going on, we should have high-rise buildings and higher quality 'building owners'. With the upgrading of living conditions, the quality should also be upgraded at the same time. I hope the whole society will work together to reduce throwing at high altitude, so that people passing by will no longer be afraid.