Now it is often heard that some teachers divide the students in schools. Should teachers really divide the students?
Now, in school, if a person has both wisdom and power, which one will he use first? I think, of course, wisdom; if this person is a fool, without wisdom, only power? I think he will try his best to use the power in his hand and play to the extreme. The examination room of a middle school in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province just illustrates this point. Today, it is reported that on November 8, in the mid-term examination of No.2 Middle School in Jinxian County, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, students with poor grades were "invited" to take the examination outside the house, and one of the candidates could only stand up for the examination.
I can't remember which celebrity said this: only unqualified teachers, no unqualified students. I think this sentence is very profound. Students only have IQ differences, and there is no difference between good and bad. The five plus sheep students are no longer synonymous with excellent students, and the test scores can not show whether a student is excellent or not. It is just those "poor students" who are not expected to become the top talents after graduation. Those students who score five percent (five percent) in the entrance examination will either go abroad or become an adult Senior wage earners. A study shows that most of the students who can become talents after they grow up are the students who ranked in the top 10 to 20 in the class, which is known as the "10 to 20 phenomenon".
Students go to school to receive education, which is the right given to citizens by the education law. Students are neither good nor bad, nor should they be divided into three, six or nine grades. Teachers who can only use their power to divide students into three, six or nine grades can only prove their incompetence. They don't have wisdom, they don't know how to educate, they just use their little power to toss the students. Now these people are playing to the extreme, actually put this energy to the test room. I don't know where to go in the future.
I remember that in the 1950s and 1960s, the most commonly used method for incompetent teachers was to let students who didn't obey the discipline stand or blow out of the classroom. In the 1980s and 1990s, it developed to invite parents. Now it's developing into humiliating students. Not long ago, from green scarf to red school uniform to punishing children to take off their pants and run, all showed the teacher's incompetence and helplessness. At the same time, we also see that some teachers are actually law blind. They do not realize that they are in violation of the education law. It is not only an insult to the students' personality, but also an injury to the students' soul to divide the children into three, six and nine grades. The parents of the students have the right to sue the teachers concerned and ask for compensation for the mental damage. The headmaster also needs to bear the legal responsibility for the violation of the education law.
We say that in the campus, teachers and students are the relationship between education and being educated, but they are equal in personality. If there is anything different, it is that the personality of students is still in the growth period and mature period, which needs more care. At this time, if teachers don't pay attention, they will hurt their growth. To put it more seriously, they will bring up citizens with unsound personality to the society. In this sense, insulting students' personality is endangering society and creating unstable factors for society. Schools are factories that produce reserve talents for the society. Even if we do not pay attention to them, they may produce defective products or waste products. Our society does not need defective products, let alone waste products. If the school outputs a lot of waste products for the society, it is a question whether the school can continue to exist. Should the principal and teacher also go to prison? At least the parents have the right to claim for spiritual losses from the school.
As an educator, he can not have a little power (mainly management power) in his hands, but this power serves for education, not for teachers to vent their personal indignation. Therefore, we should also strengthen the supervision of the power in the hands of teachers. Because incompetent teachers often use their power to punish students, and punishment just shows that the teacher's education level is low, that he is not suitable for the teaching post, and that he needs children to take a dump.