[a share from Haimei] Haimei heard yesterday that no sex life can be regarded as disabled? Walter? The little partner who heard the news was not good enough. It's not enough to watch the full screen show of love all day long. If she is single and has no sex life, she should be called "sick"? A reply from netizens, does this mean that Luguan will become a Paralympic event
Simple ~ the way to abuse dogs is simple~
Recently, the World Health Organization (who) is preparing a new standard, and the main content of the new standard is that from now on, those who can't have children because they don't have sex or can't find a partner can be identified as disabled.
In the past, even infertility was not regarded as a disability. However, it's amazing that now who will change this standard. They suggest that people who can't find a suitable partner or lack sex life and have no children, including infertility, should be equally regarded as a disability. The reason is that this change will give everyone the right to have children. According to the new rules, both heterosexual and homosexual single men and women, when they encounter fertility problems, have the same priority as those who have a partner. They can realize their dream of having children by means of in vitro in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Of course, until now this standard has not really come out, so infertility is still not a disability. Infertility refers to 12 months or more, there is a regular sexual life, and do not take contraceptive measures, still can not succeed in the situation.
Click next for more details
Dr. David Adamson, one of the standard advocates, said that the current definition of infertility can be written like this, including all individuals who want to form a family, including single men and women and gay men and women. In other words, whether they have a partner or not, they have the right to have children. In this way, the status quo of those who should be included in this group and those who should enjoy IVF will be fundamentally changed.
Critics say this is nonsense.
Gareth Johnson, a member of Parliament who has received IVF, said, "I can say that I am a supporter of IVF, but I never think infertility is a disability or a disease. Instead, it is a medical problem.
I said from the beginning that IVF should be used more to help infertile couples, but we should make sure that the technology is authentic. This inconsistent definition puts the work done by the National Institutes of health and clinical optimization and other organizations in the past to ensure that IVF technology is used in infertile couples is in danger of being obliterated. Frankly, it is trying to put IVF technology in an inapplicable category.
Josephine Quintavalle, of the British charity review on reproductive ethics, said the statement is not only a simple redefinition of infertility, but also obscures the significance of biological processes and natural mating between men and women.
A spokesman for the Department of Health said the NHS had no obligation to comply with WHO recommendations.
According to the London Equality Act 2010, if a person is considered disabled, he must have physical or psychological disability, and these disabilities will have a substantial and long-term negative impact on his daily activities.
Some netizens reply, does this mean that the sport will become a Paralympic event
[Haimei, who is Haimei
Gender: Female
Hobby: Male
Occupation: editor of female column of sihai.com
Even if you want to find the most satisfying answer, you need to go all over the world.
Contact Haimei: if you want to talk about your ideal, talk about your life, and get more fashion information, Haimei will praise you here first!
Wechat: w4hw plus I have a surprise!